Boy, 14, and accomplice 'kicked man to death after he found them burgling a house'
Bailed to murder: Gang of teenage hoodies kicked former soldier to death for £5 they wanted to spend on booze and drugs
Taking into account the routine nature of the scenarios above, With dogmatic confidence the Powers that Be will still proclaim you wrong to suggest that the victims in these cases should have been armed with a gun, can of pepperspray, or even a club. After all, should weapons be legally available to carry by the law abiding, feral youths like this would have surely been carrying them to murder and obtain small change.
Or, is it that these hyped up wild animals, rather than commit calculative murder, see a chance to satisfy their sadistic urges and flex their muscles for the rush instead? Would effective weapons legally available for defensive purposes mean we'd have a shot victim or several shot thugs?
I'm curiously speculative as to whether any of these undeserving, press adorned anti-weapon zealots could honestly look into the eyes of one of these victims and say that had they have been armed with a weapon, things would have been worse? Would they proudly proclaim a rape victim as a model citizen for not carrying a groin-taylored dagger and instead laying down and giving in? After all, according to them there is "No possible excuse" for carrying a weapon and jail should be awarded to you should you dare to not comply.
I seriously wonder if asked whether they'd choose between a pistol or a mobile phone when confronted by an AIDs ridden crackhead, they'd proudly accept the later?
The slimy truth is, they have the audacity to demand that we do.
...............................................
Email www.gun-control-network.org and have your say.
Email www.homeoffice.gov.uk/complaints and have your say.
Join www.armbritain.com and have your say.
Visit www.britainneedsguns.co.uk.
If you see that change can't be found within in any other party, then join www.lpuk.org.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
The crackdown after Dunblane was unjustified but...
An old man pulling a gun on a thug could be overpowered and shot, turning a burglary into a murder. Worse, if the burglar expected armed householders they could be armed themselves and twitchily fire off a round. More guns in society and you get a mini arms race.
I'm not sure about the arms-race argument.
My experience over the last ten years has been that the violence is increasing in volume and severity and it is far more common for it to be the work of several thugs at once. Gone are the days of the honest one on one fight, over when one person hits the deck.
They simply have no deterrent. And it doesn't matter if you're a well built guy who can handle himself, they'll just wait until you wander into a deserted car park when its dark (happened to a work colleague this last friday at 6pm!!).
To carry a weapon OR not to carry a weapon. To fight back OR surrender. Its THEIR choice. NOT yours Clifford.
Post a Comment