Utopian and dystopian fiction is often weakened by cardboard characters. Not so in this case. German author Eugen Richter (1838–1906), a libertarian politician and journalist none of us is likely to have heard of, was not only blessed with uncanny insight about the realities of socialism, he had a novelist's ability to create engaging characters.
The story is narrated by a middle-aged bookbinder named Schmidt, who initially welcomes the "entirely new and glorious times … in store for us" as socialism takes over Germany. As events unfold, he grows increasingly troubled, providing reasoned analysis suffused with denial that borders on the comic. Vowing to "set down, in a humble way, some little account of the beginning of this new reign of brotherhood and universal philanthropy," he never reveals his first name. But we hear about his son, Franz, daughter, Annie, daughter-in-law, Agnes, and his "better half, Paula," while experiencing his pain as he recounts their reversals at the hands of the new socialist order, climaxing in his own tragic end.
This is not a socialism of Stalinist murderers, but of social engineers who unhesitantly subordinate freedom to their egalitarian ideals, a path that leads inevitably to totalitarianism, material impoverishment, and violence. When the government's plan to confiscate all financial assets leaves the narrator's daughter-in-law, Agnes, "inconsolable," Schmidt sympathizes, explaining that "for a long time past she has been industriously saving up."
But after the confiscation decree is issued, he reports that "it was in vain that my wife sought to comfort [Agnes] with the thought of the opulent dowry which the Government meant all newly married couples to receive." Of course, the government goes increasingly broke and fails to deliver.
After the government asks all citizens to register their preference for a job, with all wages set at perfect equality, Schmidt sadly reports: "Those who have manifested a desire to become cleansers of sewers are, numerically, not a strong body."
Pictures of the Socialistic Future- Eugen Richter
Why is it?
1 day ago
2 comments:
I haven't yet read the book, but this is the second recommendation I've seen for it.
Andy Duncan wrote an extensive review for The Cobden Centre.
NEVERTHELESS, THE CIVIL LAW is and must be neutral about who has a more noble or rewarding faith. The breakaway parishes ought to win every Office 2010facet of the lawsuit not becauseMicrosoft Office 2010 their beliefs or their politics are better, Microsoft wordbut because both lawOffice 2007and equity, along with common sense, are on Microsoft Officetheir side.Microsoft Office 2007 Not only does Virginia state law (the Division Statute)Office 2007 keyexplicitly apply to just such a Office 2007 downloadsituation as now exists, but the history Office 2007 Professionalespecially of The Falls Church argues against the claims of Outlook 2010the Virginia Diocese with which theyMicrosoft outlookhave disassociated.Microsoft outlook 2010First, The Falls Church wasWindows 7 founded, formed, and developed long before the diocese, or the national Episcopal Church, even existed.
Post a Comment