Monday, 20 September 2010

So Guess Where Clegg Got This Orwellian Idea Of Using Lie Detectors








Well from here of course that was in 2003. What next ? beatings with a rubber hose? water boarding? head held under in ice cold baths. What I find truly terrifying is that this proposal has not raised one squeak of protest. Have we really become that inured to the lengths the State will go to to extract money? Clegg, just drop the word Liberal, you are a Social Democrat, Social Democracy is a Marxist ideology bent on social engineering based on the coercive power of the State.



Clegg and his bunch of sandal clad 'nice' Socialists evidently believe that giving the incompetent and arrogant HMRC should be given even more power, the outgoing bunch of state hoodlums gave these people the power to turn up unannouced at your home or business to demand your correspondence and files.



This is not normal, please God does nobody care because they do not thing it will happen to them ?



I called the first house I built 'The Tything' because one of my ancestors led and was involved in a near riot three hundred plus years ago when the Church authorities tried to reinstate the Tythe. He was fined 6d for his pains. Things were simpler then, but at least they knew the meaning of theft then.

UPDATE

It’s not smaller government I believe in. It’s a different kind of government: a liberating government. This government will transform the state. Reversing generations of centralisation. Putting power into people’s hands. Because the job of government is not to run people’s lives. It is to help people to run their own.

Nick Clegg- Still the Big State

3 comments:

john in cheshire said...

Yes, some of us do care and yes, some of us do think it will happen to us. And yes, we are just waiting for someone to give us the word for the revolution to begin.

Antisthenes said...

As much as I agree with your views and I see the inherent dangers quite eruditely put forward by yourself when politicians put forward such things as this I also see the flaws in your protestations. In theory you are perfectly correct of course and the Libertarian point of view is the ideal. However to be in a world that is truly Libertarian it would be necessary never to have contact between human beings because once you do you start the semblance of a society and for a society to function it needs rules and as that society grows and becomes more complex then more and more rules are necessary. The more rules you have then the less liberty you are bound to have so the true Libertarian ideal recedes, the best a Libertarian can do is ensure that these rules are applied fairly unfortunately that will inevitably require more liberty sapping rules.

Microsoft Office 2007 said...

NEVERTHELESS, THE CIVIL LAW is and must be neutral about who has a more noble or rewarding faith. The breakaway parishes ought to win every Office 2010facet of the lawsuit not becauseMicrosoft Office 2010 their beliefs or their politics are better, Microsoft wordbut because both lawOffice 2007and equity, along with common sense, are on Microsoft Officetheir side.Microsoft Office 2007 Not only does Virginia state law (the Division Statute)Office 2007 keyexplicitly apply to just such a Office 2007 downloadsituation as now exists, but the history Office 2007 Professionalespecially of The Falls Church argues against the claims of Outlook 2010the Virginia Diocese with which theyMicrosoft outlookhave disassociated.Microsoft outlook 2010First, The Falls Church wasWindows 7 founded, formed, and developed long before the diocese, or the national Episcopal Church, even existed.