Monday, 20 December 2010

You say you want a revolution? I say 'No thanks'

In light of recent events, reading this today made me shudder at what next year might bring, I am not a fan of revolutions, as they get out of hand far too easily and cause unnecessary suffering and even death to ordinary people. Plus they are hardly good for private property and the rule of law! Most of all thought they tend to decrease liberty (the US war of Independence being the most obvious exception)

So when I read Libertarians saying in effect 'bring it on' I have say my view is 'hell no'-mainly because we'd loose. We have seen how easy it is for our ideological opponents (leftists, statists, Fabians, call they what you will) to get tens of thousands of people on the streets waving socialist worker placards and smashing up topshops. We, on the other hand struggle to fill a small pub in London. If it did kick off next year, can you honestly say you'd think we'd get less government?

Too many people had bought the line that everything going down now is due to 'greedy bankers' and taxing the rich would prevent the (minuscule) cuts being made. For us to succeed we need to play a long game, and focus on getting out to real people with the truth about how economics, money and government work. Most of all we need to be saying over and over 'There's no such thing as a free lunch'.
The free market/classical liberal movement had done pretty poorly in the past at getting this message out to people. I believe it should be LPUK's priority to focus on this and build our base, focusing on grassroots networks and getting in a position to supplant the Tories and Lib dems in local councils over the next few years.
It will take time for us to build up momentum (time we may not have), remember how long it took the Fabians to get to the position where they could implement their agenda. Even if it takes us 20 years, is still better than blood on the streets

7 comments:

Vladimir said...

Yes, indeed, these are the "demos". You need them to win an election, but they are gullible idiots, and their minds are in the pockets of those who control education and broadcasting.

I'm sorry to say that I don't see how they will ever be won over to your side. Even if you break the link between them and their Fabian overlords, you cannot shake the fact that an electorally significant proportion of society really is better off with the Fabians. Welfare recipients, for example, and the bureaucrats who administer such redistribution. You can never convince these people that they would be better off if they got proper jobs. You will only get their votes by outright dishonesty, and the Fabians are way ahead of you on that.

Personally, I hope for a "Berlin Wall" moment, where the Fabian state collapses from its own stagnation, debt and corruption, and something else arises in its place.

Harbinger said...

It will take time for us to build up momentum (time we may not have), remember how long it took the Fabians to get to the position where they could implement their agenda. Even if it takes us 20 years, is still better than blood on the streets

Andy, the Fabians were merely latter day ideologists whom merely continued on the agenda of the elites, whom they are of and work for. The Huxleys, the Wells, the Bertrand Russells, were merely there to advance the plan of the elites into continuing the control of people, that is continuing the slavery of British society as started back at the time when that lovely man William came over and conquered us in 1066. He brought feudalism and we're rapidly heading back that way.

You know, you say 20 years to implement the Libertarian agenda. Really? How so? People won't have a clue what liberty is, because I can rapidly see a society where dictionaries will become things of the past as doublespeak and doublethink become prominent within our society. You're also forgetting that as our controllers garnish yet more control of society via the MSM and state brain laundries, where are these intelligent people going to come from? Education fees will only be there for those who can afford them and how on earth is an overpopulated UK, full of conflict from growing cultures and cults going to manage to put their children into WORK let alone University to educate the old grey matter?

I really think that people like you are oblivious to the reality of just what's going on within society and that is there won't be any 'free society' left in 20 years time. Our population will be so braindead thanks to constant brainwashing getting ever more and more thanks to the MSM, not forgetting genetically altered humans thanks to Monsanto GM crops and animals with god knows what in them from GM crops and fertiliser.

We're looking at the very nearing of end game for society as we know it, as we move into a Huxely, Brave New World Dystopia, where everyone simply loves being a slave. The Elite simply look at you and I as useless eaters, Elites who have been controlling civilisations from as far back (and before) Babylonian Times. It's the same organisations, the same families who are sculpting society into one where they will continue having total supremacy, as they manage to make their populous agree that there are far too many of them and need to be culled - DEPOPULATION IS ON ITS WAY, whether by WW3 and/or continued manipulation of medicines, food and water supply.

The Libertarian Party doesn't have 20 years for goodness sake for the simple reason that Liberty will be a thing of the past very shortly. Think about these words - USELESS EATERS. That's what most within society are and they're expendable.

Michael Fowke said...

Unfortunately, people don't want to be free. Too much responsibility.

SumoKing said...

I've said for a long time you need the 'less government' message first and the less tax message second.

I'm fairly sure that the rabid students smashing up westminster (who I am not entirely unsympathetic to being that they are been taxed for something that the 16 year olds couldn't vote on but the MPs imposing had the free benefit of) would buy a "get vince cable off your back, free the unversities from political yoke!" message.

Similarly I beleive a lot of parents would go for less local authority meddling in thier lives so long as you don't start the argument with "I live in a fcuking massive house in the south east and I want more liberty cause it is cheaper and I can buy more steak"

It's too often that the libertarian message comes across or is presented as "Less tax on the rich more cost on the poor!" that does not play well with the swathes of people who have been lied to by government that help was coming and this giro will tide them over till it arrives.

Simon said...

Good post Andy. I wish the energy and intelligence that went into wittering on about a revolution on Twitter went into forming a proper business basis for the party to trade on.

Even if we fail to persuade people to stay calm and stop from smashing the place up those cavaliers need to realize they have already lost the ideological revolution. If violence breaks out today it will be a Fabian revolution and will enforce Fabian ideology - except all at once and violently. Any sensible revolutionary should address the preparatory phase of spreading the ideology they want to live under after the revolution. In short, even if LPUK cannot persuade them to remain calm, they should at least be helping LPUK now to ensure they get what they want from their violent bloodletting and murder.

Hopefully, once they see the party up and running properly the desire to kick off will be diminished.

There is a separate question, as to whether we wish to be associated with anyone so violent, but my present reading is they they are harmless. It's the NUS we need to worry about!

John said...

Agreed. Revolution is no solution.
It needs to be a dawning of reality in the benighted minds that have been brain washed into submission to the creed of darkness and control!
I do think it can be done.
If simple truth/reality is presented so that it makes sense then people wake up and shrug off the lies. When they realise the truth there is that: "you can't be serious" moment and the lies cease to have effect.
The only reason the liars are winning is that they have convinced Joe Public that they are correct, reasonable and true. And not just con men.
But that's how con men work.

JUN said...

In this distress he was received into the house of Mr. Waldron, where he lay concealed for some time. When the place of his retreat was at length discovered, he took refuge in Flanders, whore he died after a mbt trainers few months' residence, in the summer of 1791.Under the hospitable roof of this worthy and amiable man, Whalley resumed the care of Jonson ; but want of books, and, perhaps, of sufficient composure of mind, rendered his attcmpte ineffectual, and the manuscript was finally abandoned to his friend, who, in the year 1792, coach outlet store online commenced the publication of it in numbers. The success apparently fell short of the expectations of the editor, as the work was not continued beyond the second number.Mr. Waldron neither possessed, nor pretended to be possessed of, scholastic learning; but he was laborious, accurate, conversant with the stage, and imbued with a rational love of the ancient drama, which he had studied coach bags outlet with success. He appears to have collated Whalley's copy with the early editions ; and, on attentively retracing his steps, previously to the arrangement of the text for the present publication, I found much to approve in the caution andI Whalley'« text was that of the booksellers' edition, five finger shoes in Svo. This had been in Theobald's band«, and an incidental remark by him, of no moment whatever, here and there appeared in Ule margin.judgment with which he had uniformly proceeded. His friendship for Whalley, however, has led him to form far too high an estimate of that gentleman's qualifications ; and beyond the revision which I have just mentioned, he seems to have contemplated no alteration of the papers left in his hands.Many years had elapsed since the failure, last mentioned, when the republication coach outlet coupon of Joneon w»s proposed to me by Mr. George Nicol, to whom Whalley'e corrected copy had been consigned by Mr. Waldron. I was well aware of the labor and difficulty of the task ; but my objections were overcome by the encouragement of my friend, and I undertook the edition, confident that I was not about to coach purses outlet encumber the public with a superfluous work, for Jonson had now been long out of the bookseller's hands. One motive there yet was, which had some influence on my determination — a desire, though late, to render justice to the moral character of the author, and rescue him from the calumnies of his inveterate persecutors. My mind had been prejudiced at an early period by the commentators on our old dramas, and I verily believed, as they repeatedly assured me, that " tho great mbt shoes clearance object of Jonson's life was the persecution of Shakspeare ; " nor was it until I became acquainted with the dates of his respective performances that I ventured to question the accuracy of the critics, or to entertain a suspicion that they were actuated by unworthy motives, and could only be relieved 5 finger shoes from the charge of wanton malevolence by the plea of incorrigible folly.Previously to the arrangement of the text, it became necessary to collate the old editions. In the execution of this part of the work, the mode adopted in the revision of Maesinger was carefully followed.